|
KMID : 1148120220120010011
|
|
Journal of Advanced Spine Surgery
2022 Volume.12 No. 1 p.11 ~ p.18
|
|
|
Early Radiologic Evaluation of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
|
|
Kwon Jae-Yoel
Lee Ho-Jin
Kim Il-Sup
Hong Jae-Taek
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
Purpose: Minimally invasive technique in spinal surgery have evolved including cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw technique which is s new lumbar pedicle screw path, as an alternative fixation technique for lumbar spine. Theoretical advantage is that it provides enhanced screw torque and has biomechanical characteristics, also it minimizes approach-related damages. Midline lumbar fusion (MIDLF) has appeared with CBT screw technique. Many studies of CBT screw reported the effectiveness of MIDLF. We adopted this technique for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and evaluated early radiological outcomes.
Materials and Methods: From May 2014 to March 2015, 17 patients (mean age 65.6±7.5 years; 4 males, 13 females) underwent MIDLF procedures for the treatment of single level lumbar spondylolisthesis. Average follow-up period was 8.8±2.7 months. Initial and last follow-up X-ray and computed tomography (CT) were evaluated for screw malposition, detection of peri-screw halo, loosening of the construct, or signs of spinal instability.
Results: The average bone mineral density (BMD) was -1.9±0.8. Eleven patients were fused at L4-5, 5 were at L3-4, and 1 was at L2-3. Five CBT screws were converted into pedicle screws due to intraoperative misposition of screws, so total 63 CBT screws were evaluated for peri-screw halo and malposition. There were no findings of screw pull-out or breakage in all screws. Four out of 63 (6.3%) screws were judged as peri-screw halo, and 20 (41.2%) screws were judged as malposition (1 medial; 2 superior; 17 lateral pedicle violation). But, there were no screw related nerve root injury. In all cases, interbody bony mass were identified. Four out of 17 (23.6%) patients were detected more than 2 degrees motions on flexion-extension lateral X-rays at final follow-up, and 1 out of these 4 patients was identified loss of reduction. There was no operation related complication.
Conclusion: There is no doubt that MIDLF with CBT screw is the minimally invasive method. Many numbers of screw malposition identified in our series were thought to be due to our earlier experience of trying free hands technique. We recommend the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy, which achieve accuracy. Although MIDLF with CBT has theoretical strengths, we must evaluate further long-term clinical follow-up and measure outcome.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Lumbar spine, Degenerative spondylolisthesis, Midline lumbar fusion (MIDLF), Cortical bone trajectory (CBT)
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|
|